The basis on how to play the game is just like any other shooter, you play the objective whilst getting kills(or for a less gore way you knock them out). Mainly to play this you look around and click the triggers on your controller. There are benefits to having a McDonald's menu also whilst playing the game, you are able to automatically kill someone even if your not looking at them or even in their general direction. Also with your McDonald's menu you can fly, run super fast, teleport, take no damage and even give other players your menu. With playing battlefield it is very realistic in the sense that if you shoot a gun there is bullet drop on your shots, if you're the assault class or even the support class you are able to put down boxes that contain ammo or health for you and your teammates. Battlefield series games usually focus on large, online multiplayer battles. All of the Battlefield games since Battlefield 2 in the series centrally record online statistics for each player allowing you to receive rank promotions and weapon unlocks based on your statistics as well as awards such as medals, ribbons and, pins. There are 4 classes in all Battlefields, there is the; Assault class who mainly uses assault rifles. There is the engineer who mainly uses personal defense weapons(sub machine guns). There is the support who uses light machine guns and there is the Recon who mainly uses sniper rifles. These 4 classes mainly use those type of weapons but their are sub class weapons and these categorys are; carbines, shotguns, dmrs and, hand guns/pistols.
In total there ave been 11 battlefield games and 12 expansions.
Battlefield 4 is most definitely more realistic than Battlefield hardline it is just a perspective base on my part but still. So overall I feel as if Battlefield 4 is way better than Battlefield hardline.
Which battlefield do you think is better? (<-- click the link)
if you just started playing this game what system would you recomend to play it on ?
ReplyDeleteany console you own but i play it on xbox 360 and pc/computer
Deletealso try to make information to catch the reader eye so they will ewant respond to more of your blogs
ReplyDeletei agree it was very hard to read the blog and he should try to make the color less green and use auto correct
Deletei agree it was very hard to read the blog and he should try to make the color less green and use auto correct
DeleteIts not that battlefiled hardline is crap its just you got to get use to using weapons but thats my opinion
ReplyDeletewell im sry mr i play all day, i am use to them durr. i know how to play 1v1 me on my server xbox 360. XD lol jk. but fr i can play K/D: 2.87
Deletemost of my conquest matches i go about 50-70 kills and like 2-14 deaths
DeleteI agree with Seth that once you get used to the controls which are completely customizable to how you want to play you can begin to enjoy your game and their is a good reason for many types of guns because it provides diversity and each gun is better for each situation you can enter. This is more a positive by allowing for a more unique experience rather than the same situations over and over.
DeleteI believe the main reason that battlefield hardline has less guns due to it involving the police force rather than the military which is a perfectly logical reason and your "Mcdonald's Menu" is what ruins the community for battle field however it is very enjoyable every once in a while.
ReplyDelete:D i 100% agree
DeleteI think the mcdonalds menu make the game more enjoyable for you but not for other people but i think the mcdonalds menu will make the game better.
ReplyDeleteWhat is a Mcdonalds menu?
DeleteNever having played the game, I cannot accurately answer this question. But, from what I have read, Battlefield 4 looks to be the superior game. While more realism doesn't necessarily mean a better game, it does add something. And of course a wider variety of weapons can be nothing but good.
ReplyDeleteI agree,some of the best games aren't very realistic. Doesn't make them any worse of a game. Then again,who doesn't love a huge selection of weapons? :)
DeleteI agree about a larger variety of weapons is not a good thing. Some weapons require a proper buff or nerf, but they just buff or nerf the entire field of weapons rather than the individual weapons because its "too difficult".
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI understand using mod menus is fun but if yu truly like a game then why use it. If you feel battlefield hardline isn't good then why even play it
ReplyDeleteTrue people should not play games if they don't like them.
DeleteI think the mcdonalds menu make the game more enjoyable for you but not for other people but i think the mcdonalds menu will make the game better.
ReplyDeleteI think the mcdonalds menu make the game more enjoyable for you but not for other people but i think the mcdonalds menu will make the game better.
ReplyDeleteboth games have pros and cons Hardline was created pretty much for a different change of scenery and situations also different game modes weapons and so forth. In my opinion hardline was created just for EA to take your money it shouldn't be sold seperetely more like a DLC
ReplyDeleteAlso, hardline was created by a different company (visceral) so it gives the game an overall different feeling.
DeleteI've never played the game,but basing off other games I've played,I think I'd be in the Reacon class,since once I get a sniper I find a spot and don't move the whole game. Easy way to rack up kills. Sounds like a fun game!
ReplyDeleteI think Battlefield 4 is better, but that is just my own opinion after owning Battlefield 4 and only playing the beta for Hardline. It seems a lot like a desperate money grab on EA's behalf, and they should've just published this game as DLC. Battlefield 4's realism is what gets me most, and thats why its the preferable game.
ReplyDeleteI have never played either one but from what i m reading it definitely seems like battlefield 4 is better. Especially because I do not like games where you buy guns I like games where you play and earn them.
ReplyDeleteThe system in hardline makes it pretty similar to the system in 4 in terms of getting guns. They weapons are not ridiculously overpriced and money can be earned very quickly if you play well. When you buy a new gun it is just as satisfying as earning one like in other games.
DeleteAs much as I haven't played either games, I still agree that Battlefield is one of the most realistic FPS's, and is a pretty great series. Battlefield 3 is definitely the best in my opinion, but this blog has really given me an idea of what the newer games are like compared to it.
ReplyDeletebattle felied hardline is much better because of the multiplayer capabilities
ReplyDeleteHaving not played either of the two discussed games, i'll take your word for it. I do however have fond memories of playing the original battlefield, because it was the game that could run on my dad's terrible hp laptop. I prefer arcadey (The focus is on action rather than realism.) shooters do to there more competitive environment. (Examples: Counter strike, Team Fortress 2.)
ReplyDeletePersonally, I think Hardline was more fun to play because it always felt like more close quarters combat. I think they both have their pros and cons and if they took the pros from both games, they could make a very enjoyable and competitive experience.
ReplyDeleteAs much as I haven't played either games, I still agree that Battlefield is one of the most realistic FPS's, and is a pretty great series. Battlefield 3 is definitely the best in my opinion, but this blog has really given me an idea of what the newer games are like compared to it.
ReplyDeleteThough I have never played any Battlefield games, from what you described I think I can agree with you that Battlefield 4 seems like the better game out the two you had discussed.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteneither games take any skill what so ever. Halo on the other hand takes way more skill! fun fact i'm #1 in Ohio for the greatest Halo 4 player and i'm also #97 in the world for kills in the game with a total of over 202,000 kills in the game.
ReplyDeleteneither games take any skill what so ever. Halo on the other hand takes way more skill! fun fact i'm #1 in Ohio for the greatest Halo 4 player and i'm also #97 in the world for kills in the game with a total of over 202,000 kills in the game.
ReplyDelete